split

... adding to your ideas i think we should try make three proposals that have emerged from a same sense of views. We have to follow the 'one person' effort for the LOS competition. Maybe the third is just a projection of this blog (as a meeting point between us) into a redefined architectural practice of keeping progressive. But again as steve said they have to relate to eachother. If you see this from the winning side if atleast one of the two 'design' entries win, the third entry(which would be a doc of our actual meeting point) has to win. Because winning design entry justifies that the third idea works. so its either three, two or none!